February 1st, 2010 01:55am

The right time to save a dog’s life.

by Pets

This has been a soul searching couple of weeks for this blogger, who has spent the past several years working with animal rescue. Part of what I do brings me great joy. I am part of an organization that goes to overcrowded shelters in California and selects animals to rescue. The animals undergo health checks, spayed/neutered, groomed, temperament tested and then placed for adoption at their new shelter.

I have written before about adoption being a location business. What gets adopted in one place, often goes wanting in another. The recent flight of Chihuahuas from California to New York City is one example of a breed being popular in one region, but in another creates overpopulation.

It used to be that when a female dog was discovered pregnant, the puppies were aborted during spay surgery and the mother was put up for adoption. Yet if puppies are present in another overcrowded shelter, they are transported out and placed for adoption. Puppies go quickly.

So now the debate is whether female dogs close to term with their puppies, ought to be placed into foster and allowed to whelp. If the momma dog is healthy and of a good temperament, there is a leap of faith her puppies might be just fine. I have been involved in that part of fostering and have brought into the world more than a dozen litters. The puppies were all adopted.

I debate that it was an irresponsible owner who allowed the dog to go un-spayed and resulted in the pregnancy. Likely she was dumped at the shelter because no one wanted to deal with the puppies. It’s not her fault. My heart breaks that this should be a death sentence for otherwise perfectly fine animals.

But the soul searching is by doing these kinds of fosters, I have been accused of adding to the pet overpopulation. The allegation hurt because it’s true.

Right now, I have five puppies at my house. They will soon go up for adoption. And they better thank their lucky stars they were one week old when they were found, because they made it, by one week.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

Comments

3 Comments

  1. February 1st, 2010 5:00 pm

    Who, precisely, is making these allegations? Without naming soures, commentary such as this just is vague gossip — it isn’t news and isn’t journalism by any means. Are the people who state that “people who foster pups add to problem” themselves involved in and profiting from the sale of puppies somehow? I have to wonder.

    Is the dog community so in-bred and touchy that the individuals can’t be named? What’s up with THAT?

    Over-population is caused by breeding, period. And breeding for profit is the worst offense of all. (The Press Democrat isn’t helping by running ads for puppies for sale).

    by gr8nsmall


  2. February 3rd, 2010 1:33 pm

    The pups are fostered through shelters and not for profit breeding. There was no intentional breeding going on. These are animals dumped in night boxes with litters or who are pregnant.
    Overpopulation is overpopulation, be it breeding for profit or non-profits “rescuing” pups.
    Is any dog’s life more noble than the others?

    by Pets


  3. February 11th, 2010 1:19 pm

    Whenever I look through the pet section it sickens me to see photos of litters of pups. Often these litters are for financial gain, and not in the animals’ best interest. I see the faces of dogs in shelters waiting for caring homes. I have to agree that breeding for profit is the worse offense of all.

    by Carolyn Sekela


Submit Your Comments

Required

Required, will not be published